A Contraction-Free Focused Sequent Calculus for Classical Propositional Logic

نویسنده

  • Anders Starcke Henriksen
چکیده

Existing focused proof systems for classical and intuitionistic logic allow contraction for exactly those formulas chosen for focus. For proof-search applications, contraction is undesirable, as we risk traversing the same path multiple times. We present here a contraction-free focused sequent calculus for classical propositional logic, called LKFCF, which is a modification of the recently developed proof system LKF. We prove that our system is sound and complete with respect to LKF, and therefore it is also sound and complete with respect to propositional classical logic. LKF can be justified with a compilation into focused proofs for linear logic; in this work we show how to do a similar compilation for LKFCF, but into focused proofs for linear logic with subexponentials instead. We use two subexponentials, neither allowing contraction but one allowing weakening. We show how the focused proofs for linear logic can then simulate proofs in LKFCF. Returning to proof-search, we end this work with a small experimental study showing that a proof-search implementation based on LKFCF performs well compared to implementations based on leanTAP and several variants and optimizations on LK and LKF. 1998 ACM Subject Classification F.4.1 Mathematical Logic

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

A Contraction-free and Cut-free Sequent Calculus for Propositional Dynamic Logic

In this paper we present a sequent calculus for propositional dynamic logic built using an enriched version of the tree-hypersequent method and including an infinitary rule for the iteration operator. We prove that this sequent calculus is theoremwise equivalent to the corresponding Hilbert-style system, and that it is contraction-free and cut-free. All results are proved in a purely syntactic ...

متن کامل

A Semantical Analysis of Focusing and Contraction in Intuitionistic Logic

Focusing is a proof-theoretic device to structure proof search in the sequent calculus: it provides a normal form to cut-free proofs in which the application of invertible and non-invertible inference rules is structured in two separate and disjoint phases. Although stemming from proofsearch considerations, focusing has not been thoroughly investigated in actual theorem proving, in particular w...

متن کامل

Expansion Nets: Proof-Nets for Propositional Classical Logic

We give a calculus of proof-nets for classical propositional logic. These nets improve on a proposal due to Robinson by validating the associativity and commutativity of contraction, and provide canonical representants for classical sequent proofs modulo natural equivalences. We present the relationship between sequent proofs and proof-nets as an annotated sequent calculus, deriving formulae de...

متن کامل

Loop - free construction of counter -

We present a non-looping method to construct Kripke trees refuting the non-theorems of intuitionistic propositional logic, using a contraction-free sequent calculus.

متن کامل

Structural focalization (draft)

Focusing, introduced by Jean-Marc Andreoli in the context of classical linear logic, defines a normal form for sequent calculus derivations that cuts down on the number of possible derivations by eagerly applying invertible rules and grouping sequences of non-invertible rules. A focused sequent calculus is defined relative to some non-focused sequent calculus; focalization is the property that ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2011